.
.
.
Showing posts with label film-within-a-film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film-within-a-film. Show all posts

Monday, June 3, 2024

Arrebato (1980)

... aka: Rapture

Directed by:
Iván Zulueta

As a regular consumer of low budget and, some would say "low grade," horror, and also someone who genuinely enjoys such films for a whole host of reasons that have nothing to do with making fun of them, I have a bone to pick with this general premise. Why is it that any time a director wants to make a movie about another (fictional) director and wants to show said director is a troubled individual, they always make that person a horror director? And by "troubled," I mean the entire gamut of fucked up here. It could be a delusional person of limited to no talent, or someone who's just coasting through their profession, or someone who's not passionate about what they're doing, or someone who feels like they're "trapped" making these kinds of movies as if it's a ball-and-chain around their ankle, or a pervert, or a drug addict, or someone who's going insane, depressed, repressed, mentally defective in some way or even a psychotic killer themselves. Yup, it's always gotta be a horror director; the go-to profession for all manner of in-the-business downward spirals! 

The only other genre-specific directors I've seen treated with such disdain on a regular basis are pornographers. I suppose it's because these two genres are (more specifically were; things have thankfully changed in recent years) considered to be the lowest rung of the filmmaking ladder, at least from the vantage point of pretentious artistes. In reality, I think they mostly frown upon the fact these films are often blunt, honest and straight-forward instead of burying content under 50 layers of impenetrable metaphor.


The director in question here is José Sirgado (Eusebio Poncella), who already has such Naschy-esque titles as "La maldición del hombre lobo" under his belt, and is currently in the process of putting the finishing touches on his latest vampire epic, which is strangely titled "Wolf Men." It's clear from the get-go this man is just not feeling it anymore. Maybe he never really did. He's so stubborn and desperate to do something different that he's willing, per his own editor's evaluation, to screw up the new film ("meaningless cinema" he dubs it) in post just to do something, anything, out of the ordinary. "Fuck the movies," he says. And yet that obsession for making films is still clearly there, even if written off with passivity ("It isn't me who loves cinema, but cinema that loves me"). Maybe going through the paces as a filmmaker isn't so much a passion as it is a crutch; a place to hide.

José leaves the editing room and then drives through Madrid as a parade of theater marquees are shown; mostly famous movie titles, mostly films more successful and respected than anything he's ever done or likely will ever do. The director's career ambitions certainly aren't helped any by the fact he's also a heroin junkie, and that's the main driving force behind the entire structure and style of the film. It's the nonsensical rationalized through an unreliable narrator. Since he's always in some kind of altered state, the events that follow are assumed to be some kind of altered reality. This compounds that confusion by adding another (actual) narrator to the works; a hoarse, husky, nagging voice that's ever-present. Regular dialogue will unspool between characters and any bit of silence is used to wedge in another comment or insight from this narrator. Not only that, but this also screws around with the chronological timeline on top of that.








José's in a miserable relationship with another junkie, an actress named Ana (Cecilia Roth). Sometimes she's there, sometimes she's not. He wants to end it, and even rehearses the break-up in the elevator on the way up, but just hasn't yet, likely out of guilt because it was he who got her addicted in the first place. Returning to his unkempt apartment after work, the everyday stresses of life start getting to him. He can't wake a stoned Ana up (and later will strip her and attempt to rape her while she's still unconscious), the bathtub overflows, the toilet won't work, everything's a mess... On a more intriguing note, he's received a package containing a film reel, an audio tape and a key. He starts the tape. It's from an amateur filmmaker named Pedro (Will More) and his is the voice of the pretentious narration we hear throughout. José has only met Pedro twice previously. Now he wants to see him again and claims it's "urgent."

José is actually better acquainted with Pedro's bubbly cousin, Marta (Marta Fernández Muro), whom he used to date and who's also a drug addict. She chauffeurs him to the remote home where Pedro lives in seclusion with his aunt, Carmen (Carmen Giralt). Pedro's obsession is making 8mm movies. These aren't real movies, as in scripted movies, or even documentaries with a set purpose, but instead random, mundane home movies that he curiously refuses to show anyone else after he shoots them. Marta sometimes hears Pedro "crying in desperation" from outside his bedroom as he watches them and claims his emotional development is stunted at around 12-years-old even though he's 27. She adds that her ex-husband is the only person who has ever seen one of the films. Whatever he saw was so strange and disturbing that he never spoke to Pedro ever again.








After dinner, everyone sits down to watch TV. Carmen goes on a never-ending rant about how much she adores Alan Ladd, how perplexing it is that men like "fat" Mae West, how she hates black-and-white movies despite being color-blind herself and how dubbing makes people sound like chickens. Pedro lurks in the background staring José down and clutching a clown doll. The doll's eyes start to glow as he proceeds to fast-forward through hours of TV in just minutes. It's like he's able to control time. Or maybe José is just high again.

Later that night, the weird man-child turns up in José's bedroom unannounced to share some lines and talk. He claims he hates drugs because they make him feel grown up, yet is unable to sleep without some "powder," and adds that he doesn't get to have much sex either, yet sometimes gets to "...fuck my cousin and her husband, too" (!?) He eventually shows José some of his home movies, which seem to merely document everyday, ordinary life, yet at an accelerated frame rate and lacking the proper "rhythm" he's looking for. As he watches, Pedro starts sobbing, curls into a fetal position and clutches a teddy bear. Why is he refusing to grow up? Why is he filming his life instead of living it? He, just like José with his drug addiction, doesn't seem to be able to handle unaltered reality, or perhaps the reality of aging, stress and mortality. The voice-over attempts to shed some light about his search for "understanding the meaning, the purpose, the role, the game that 'making movies' represented." Also, major homoerotic vibes going on here, along with numerous accompanying wang shots.

This entire trip to Pedro's turns out to be a flashback, as does the next sequence, which details a second trip to the home. This time, José brings along Ana, and there are immediate arguments over the drugs that are starting to take over everyone's lives. There's also discussion about those little things that bring on, or used to bring on, intense feelings of pleasure or joy; things as simple as green slime, Betty Boop dolls and King Solomon's Mines comic books; things most of us associate with childhood. It's no coincidence that much of the soundtrack is comprised of sounds that bring to mind carnivals, music boxes, squeaky toys and other things of childhood merriment. Drugs, sex and movies are perhaps just adult attempt at being as enraptured by something in the face of maturity, life experience and cynicism.








The rest of the film returns to present as José and Ana watch the film reels Pedro sent to them. He left home the day after their last visit to experience life, and found little about it to actually enjoy. He began documenting his travels. The drug use continued. And then he accidentally recorded himself sleeping one night. An anomaly, a split second red frame, showed up in the footage. Subsequent attempts to film himself sleeping resulted in the red "pause" increasing in length. Believing this signified that his days were numbered, he and his gal pal Gloria (Helena Fernán-Gómez, who's dubbed by Pedro Almodóvar!) hit the streets to indulge their base fantasies, which include seducing a biker with promises of a three-way and then trying to (I think?) drink his blood. However, Pedro's illness worsens as he finds out some interesting things (best not described by me) about his camera...

Arrebato is the exact type of art house / transgressive / surreal / experimental / whatever-you-wanna-call-it "cult" film that interests me in some ways yet doesn't really work for me in its entirety. It may for you. Who knows? Watch it and find out for yourself. Some people, including a lot of critics, seem to love this and lavish it with praise. I found it to be a film that reaps some rewards, yet I'm not sure the patience and forgiveness required on my end to make it down this rocky road was fully justified by the actual content found therein. I also found some aspects extremely silly and unintentionally comic.

The drug and film addiction parallels as a means of adult cope are pretty in your face, and there's no escaping the fact this could have said the exact same things with a linear narrative, less self-indulgent blabber and minus the hideously unlikable characters you'd rather see get hit by a bus than given another second of time to inflict their dreary worldview upon you. I think this would have been far more compelling if the characters were sympathetic, fleshed-out a bit better, or actually worth getting to know. They're not. What's even the point of using drugs as a means to escape existential crises and recapture the brain-not-fully-developed joys of youth if all that does is make you even more miserable than before? Maybe the director was trying to paint self-important, nihilistic addicts and artists (even himself, as he was both) as insufferable killjoys who suck every ounce of joy out of a room.








In film, we often get to see the ravages of addiction on the addicts themselves, but seldom get to see the toll taken on those left to deal with the fallout. Whether in film or in real life, dealing with addicts is tedious. Hell, just being around someone who's drunk or high in any capacity when you're sober can be pretty tedious. It's especially tedious when you're around someone chemically impaired who also fancies themselves a philosopher and spouts a bunch of gibberish they think is deep and profound when it's really just shallow and semi-coherent. This film often feels like that; like you're trapped in a room with Stoned Sartre lecturing you for two hours about how life is meaningless.

Yes, this is two hours long and it's a long two hours. At one point it was actually three hours long until a merciful producer stepped in and forced the director to edit it. Seeing how what's left is insanely dialogue-heavy (between the characters and voice-overs, it's a near-constant stream of talk from beginning to end), moments of pause and reflection may have been what ended up on the cutting room floor.


Though often listed as a 1979 release on various websites (perhaps due to the fact the opening credits brag that it won a "special prize by the Ministry of Culture in the year 1979"), this actually didn't have its official premiere until June 9, 1980 at the Azul Cinema in Madrid. Though it was not initially successful, it would become a popular midnight / cult film in Spain later on and reportedly played at one theater for an entire year.

Here in America, this played at the Chicago International Film Festival in 1980, had a very limited run in 1982 and then vanished for decades without ever making its way onto home video until it was 30 years old. There was a 4k restoration in 2021, followed by another limited run in select theaters. It was given a Blu-ray release by Altered Innocence in 2022 and finally earned the ultimate film snob seal of approval when it was streamed by The Criterion Channel that same year.

★★1/2

Sunday, March 10, 2024

Dèmoni 2... l'incubo ritorna (1986)

... aka: Dämonen
... aka: Dance of the Demons 2
... aka: Demonen 2 huiveringwekkend leuk (Demons 2: Chilling Fun)
... aka: Demons 2
... aka: Demons 2: The Nightmare Is Back
... aka: Demons 2: The Nightmare Returns
... aka: Meng gui fan sheng (The Devil's Reincarnation)

Directed by:
Lamberto Bava

The original DEMONS (1985) was such a hit with Italian audiences that this sequel was immediately rushed into production, began filming a mere seven months later and was already in theaters nearly a year to the day of the first film's debut. Clearly not aspiring to do anything other than give fans a second helping of what they loved the first time out, director / co-writer Bava, producer / co-writer Dario Argento, additional writers Franco Ferrini and Dardano Sacchetti and special effects man Sergio Stivaletti repeat pretty much the exact same formula here. We're talking a very simple plot of trapped people fighting for their lives as a demonic contagion quickly spreads (with a nearly nonexistent explanation behind these events), a loud rock music soundtrack, a very high body count, identical looking ugly, green, veiny-faced demon designs, a lengthy film-within-the-film that somehow unleashes the evil and plenty of bloodshed, gruesome make-ups and elaborate special effects.

This at least makes one very good decision to alter the location. Instead of being set inside an old, dark, dingy, comparatively small flea pit movie theater, this one takes place inside an expansive, modern luxury high rise apartment building, giving it kind of a sleeker, more industrial feel that's accentuated with a consistent steely blue color palette. It also means we get a much larger playground for the demons to do their thing in. Not only are there various apartments with personalized art direction to reflect the occupants, but this building also has a gym, sauna, tanning salon, large parking garage, elevators, stairwells and more for all of the horror scenes to play out in. Sure this idea was likely cribbed from Cronenberg's Shivers (1975), which also features an outbreak inside a hi-tech apartment building, but the location change actually does make a big difference here.


As far as the characters are concerned, it's the usual assortment of thinly-defined fodder just as it was before. The closest thing to heroes we got in the first time out were hunky George and pretty music student Cheryl. Here we get another hunky student named George (David Edwin Knight) and his pretty wife, Hannah (Nancy Brilli). This does add a few slight details in that George is an extremely busy student who's also working a full-time job while his wife is 9 months pregnant and about to pop at any moment, but otherwise it's about the same routine. The more colorful and entertaining folks in the original film were those in smaller supporting parts, which is, again, mimicked here.

There's Mary (Virginia Bryant), a claustrophobic high priced call girl who's there visiting a john. There's the Haller family, including young daughter Ingrid (10-year-old Asia Argento in her feature film debut), who loves horror movies much to her father's (Antonio Cantafora) chagrin. Nearby is an even younger boy named Tommy (Marco Vivio), who's scared because he's been left all along by his mother (who's out on a date), and there's a spinster (Anita Bartolucci) and her beloved pet pooch in another unit. A number of actors return from the first film, though they're all playing different roles here. Fan favorite Bobby Rhodes (Tony the pimp from the original) is cast as drill instructor-like personal trainer Hank, while Lino Salemme (Ripper the punk from the original) is front desk security guard Frank and Eliana Miglio, featured in the film-within-a-film segment in the first, also turns up in the film-within-a-film segment here.








Early on, quite a bit of focus is placed on an incredibly shrill and irritating teen girl named Sally (Coralina Cataldi Tassoni), who is made even more annoying via the extremely whiny voice given to her in the English version. Sally is hosting her own birthday party but refuses to leave her bedroom for, hmm, reasons. When a friend complements her, she loudly shrieks "Not true! My hair stinks! This dress stinks!" She then has a meltdown over her "disgusting" shoulder pads and sleeves. Why? Well, because they "go back and forth" (?) And then when she finds out a boy she doesn't like has accidentally been invited, she has another screaming meltdown ("GET OUT!!!") and runs back into her bedroom to pout. I'm not sure if they were intentionally trying to make her unbearable so that audiences would be cheering on her demise or it just turned out that way, but spending ten minutes listening to this chick scream and complain is eleven minutes too long.

Like in the first film where the initial demon is able to enter into our world through a theater screen showing a film about demons, the one here manages to pop right out of a television set showing a movie about demons. And it immediately does us all a huge favor by choosing Sally as its first victim. Her ear-piercing whines are soon replaced by the much more pleasant sounds of deep-voiced moaning, groaning and yowling as she starts shredding her party guests with her freshly-sharpened claws and fangs, transforming the entire event into a bloodbath and creating a mini-army of demons in the process. Afterward, Sally expels some acidic ooze that eats right through the floors and enters into other apartments downstairs, contaminating even more folks. The same goo melts through the wiring, cuts out the power and phones and makes it impossible to leave the building.








George and Mary both become trapped inside the elevator, the spinster is attacked by her own dog after it laps up some contaminated blood, Hannah has to face off against a demon kid and the awful Gremlins-style rubber puppet that pops out of its chest (with the silly scene made that much worse by constant strobe lighting, grating rock guitar cues and piercing shrieks and giggles from the creature) and a group of resourceful survivors (led by Rhodes) eventually congregate in the parking garage, try to find weapons, make some Molotov cocktails, barricade the doors with cars and try to stay alive. There are some goofy murder scenes, like a woman roasted alive in a tanning bed, a guy getting smooshed in gym equipment and a demon claw squashing a guy's crotch.

It's not just the plot being rehashed here, but also some of the more memorable shots from the first film (like a group of backlit, glowing-eyed demons running down a long dark corridor in slow motion) are repeated. This also seems to repeat the mistake of constantly cutting away to irrelevant activity outside of the apartment building to show Sally's parents, Tommy's mother and a quartet of obnoxious punks (AGAIN!) driving around seemingly for the sole purpose of being able to cram more rock songs onto the soundtrack. However, I'm willing to let that slide here because the director at least uses our familiarity with the events of the original to subvert expectations and uses these characters to set up an unexpected event right outside the building.








While this suffers from the same exact issues that plagued Demons 1 (bad acting, dumb dialogue, terrible dubbing, nearly nonexistent plot...) it's just as visually stylish, handsomely shot / lit, fast-paced, brainlessly entertaining and filled with fun make-up fx. One could mark it down for recycling too much material from the first, but the change of location mostly makes up for that. 

The Simon Boswell score is perhaps not as memorable as the previous one from Goblin, but it's still pretty good, while the soundtrack (featuring The Smiths, Love and Rockets, The Art of Noise, The Cult, Gene Loves Jezebel, Dead Can Dance, Peter Murphy and more) swerves away from 80s glam metal to include a more diverse sound that includes new wave, alternative, post-punk, Gothic rock and synth-pop. As for which of the Demons films is actually better, I can now officially call it a draw.








Like its predecessor, this was a big VHS hit in much of the world, which led to the development of a third film soon after. However, that ended up going through a number of abandoned story ideas before the sequel idea was scrapped altogether. Bava and Sacchetti both left the project to do other films, but it eventually took shape as Michele Soavi's La chiesa / The Church (1989), which both Argento (a producer and writer) and Ferrini (writer) were involved with.


Similar to the very loose Zombi series, there were a few other films released under the Demons banner in different countries, though none of these are really official sequels. The aforementioned The Church was called Demons 3 in Japan. La casa dell'orco / "The Ogre's House" (1988), which was made by Bava for the Italian TV series Brivido giallo, was released in certain markets (including the U.S.) as Demons III: The Ogre. Umberto Lenzi's Black Demons (1991), an Italian production filmed in Brazil, was released in many European countries as Demons 3. 

Soavi's La setta / The Sect (1991; U.S. title - The Devil's Daughter) was called Demons 4 in Japan. Bava's La máscara del demonio / The Mask of Satan (1989), a made-for-TV loose "remake" of Bava Sr.'s BLACK SUNDAY (1960), was released in Japan and the U.S. as Demons 5: The Devil's Veil. Luigi Cozzi's Il gatto nero / The Black Cat (1989), his unsanctioned conclusion to Argento's "Three Mothers" trilogy (which Argento would officially finish himself a few decades later), was called Demon 6, or Demons 6: De Profundis, in France, Japan and the U.S. Finally, Japanese distributors (who are the ones mostly responsible for turning these unrelated films into bogus sequels) got their hands on Soavi's Dellamorte dellamore / Cemetery Man (1994) and rechristened it Demons '95 for the home video release.


For its limited 1987 theatrical run here in America, Artists Entertainment Group had around 4 minutes of gore removed so it could secure an R rating. The same cut turned up on home video courtesy of Imperial Entertainment, which claims to run 88 minutes. To my knowledge, all later DVD and Blu-ray releases, from Anchor Bay, Synapse, etc., are the uncut version running just shy of 92 minutes.

★★1/2
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...