.
.
.

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Visiting Hours (1982)

... aka: Fright, The
... aka: Get Well Soon
... aka: Horror Hospital
... aka: Terror at Central Hospital, The
... aka: Terror at the Hospital

Directed by:
Jean-Claude Lord

After a heated TV press conference, feminist journalist and non-violence advocate Deborah Ballin (Lee Grant) returns home to find her house guest dead and sweaty, woman-hating, stress-ball-squeezing psycho Colt Hawker (Michael Ironside) ready to slash her to ribbons. After being stabbed twice, Deborah manages to get the attention of her neighbors and Colt flees. She's taken to County General Hospital, where she awaits surgery on her injured arm, while Colt decides to finish the job he wasn't able to complete earlier by continually sneaking his way back into the hospital and attacking her. Several other women inadvertently become involved, including sweet nurse Sheila (Linda Purl), a divorced single mother of two, and Lisa (Lenore Zann), a loose-living party girl who Colt takes home and beats severely, but lets live. Colt's homicidal misogyny is explained by a series of brief flashbacks that involve his mother flinging a pot of hot oil into his father's face, which of course has made him a maladjusted and impotent man who detests strong, independent women... just like Deborah.






Visiting Hours has a lot going for it, especially in comparison to other films of this type from the early 80s. For starters, the budget was relatively high for a change, affording this very glossy production values and cinematography. The cast is more than competent, with Oscar-winner Grant as an atypically headstrong and authoritative middle-aged lead in a subgenre usually dominated by teen virgins in the central role. Though Deborah's not particularly likable or sympathetic, Purl's strong working class supporting character is and helps to balance that all out. Genre regular Ironside (who landed this part because of his memorable performance in Cronenberg's Scanners [1981]) also does an effective job playing the intense, creepy psycho, while William Shatner is given nothing to really do as Grant's agent. The script is quite ambitious as well in its attempt to bridge the gap between exploitative, disreputable slasher flicks and more socially-conscious thrillers. And yet all the above combined cannot save this film because it becomes an implausible mess after the first 20 or so minutes. That's a true shame considering the opening scenes offer up a few good scares and some genuine suspense.





What partially killed this film for me is its incompetent portrayal of the hospital staff and the police. The psycho manages to get into the hospital and has full access to Grant no less than four different times. Once? Sure. Twice? Highly unlikely, but possible. After that it's just plain absurd. The first time he poses as a florist and kills a patient and a nurse who are in the room Deborah was originally supposed to be in. Instead of informing her her life is in danger, the staff instead keep it a secret and she has to find out secondhand from another patient about what's going on. The killer then sneaks in a second and a third time, killing people each time he's there, but nothing much is done. My question is: Where the hell are the security guards in this film? That's right, they're all hanging out in the downstairs lobby and none happen to be on the same floor people keep getting attacked on. At one point, Shatner's character assuredly tells Grant not to worry after several murders because "They've got a great security system here," which literally made me laugh out loud. He deserves some kind of award for being able to say that line with a straight face.






Any patient in the same predicament - let alone a celebrity patient like Grant's character - would not only have several armed guards posted right outside her door at all times, but also guards in each hallway of the floor she's on monitoring who comes and goes. Not only that, but the hospital would have guards patrolling the outside perimeter of the hospital and ones in front of each and every door of that place considering the murders that keep occurring there. I also couldn't figure out why there was no attempt to relocate Deborah; if not to a new hospital entirely (she just has an injured arm for Christ's sake!) but to another floor or even another room. Of course if this film used even the most basic of logic, there may not be a film at all. Then again, is that really such a bad thing considering how stupid this thing turned out?





Unfortunately, the idiocy isn't just confined to inept security, but is liberally spread through the rest of the film as well. Shatner's character manages to convince Grant to stay in the hospital just one more night by saying he won't leave her side and then in his very next scene is off at another location doing something else entirely. Toward the end, Purl's character gets a phone call from the psycho, who's at her home. With her children's lives in danger and knowledge of the psycho's whereabouts, she gets flustered and babbles some frantic, incomprehensible gibberish to one officer before rushing home all by herself! She could have simply said "Hey, the killer is at my house RIGHT NOW, how about you gather up a few dozen men and follow me over?" Nope, instead she rushes home in a panic and needlessly gets herself stabbed. This is followed by Colt getting into Grant's room yet again and chasing her around through empty corridors because we've already established the staff and police don't seem to care that people are being murdered right and left in this place. I can handle a few dumb moments in my horror films, but this simply has far too many of them.






I've noticed a few defenders of this film pointing out that one shouldn't get too caught up in details because it's "just a horror movie." And to that I say "Precisely!" This is indeed just a horror movie. It's not a good horror movie or a memorable horror movie or a thought- provoking horror movie. It's just another horror movie lost in a faceless sea of other poorly-conceived and forgettable ones from the slash-happy early 80s. And there's a good reason Visiting Hours isn't highly-regarded among most horror and slasher fans: It's slow-moving and takes itself completely seriously yet is too implausible to even be believable.

★★

Friday, May 15, 2015

The 2015 Orloks - 1945 Results

Started many moons ago by Prof-Hieronymos-Grost, the Orloks were a yearly poll on the IMDb horror boards where users submitted Top 5 lists of their favorite horror movies for each year. All of the results were then tabulated to come up with a definitive list of the year's most-liked genre offerings. Alas, when the good Professor decided to depart the boards years ago, the awards went with him... that is until now. IMDb-er seth_yeah - taking on responsibilities as both host and calculator - has decided to bring back this long-standing tradition in 2015, and now the awards will have a permanent place right here on this blog. Scoring is rather simple and done on a weighted system where first choice receives 5 points, second choice 4 points, etc., with a +1 bonus then awarded to the #1 selection on each list. IMDb release years are being used, but it is left up to voters to determine what they may or may not consider horror (which may be in conflict with IMDb's genre labeling system). If you'd like to participate, head on over to the IMDb HORROR BOARDS to vote! So without any further ado, the results...

_________________________________________________________________________________

1945
Top 5
* * * * * * * * * *
1. The Body Snatcher
USA / 60 points / Robert Wise
* * * * * * * * * *
2. Dead of Night
UK / 58 points / Alberto Cavalcanti, Charles Crichton, Basil Dearden, Robert Hamer
* * * * * * * * * *
3. The Picture of Dorian Gray
USA / 30 points / Albert Lewin
* * * * * * * * * *
4. The Spiral Staircase
USA / 29 points / Robert Siodmak
* * * * * * * * * *
5. Isle of the Dead
USA / 21 points / Mark Robson

_________________________________________________________________________________

Making the Top 10:

6. Hangover Square / USA / 20 points / John Brahm
7. Woman Who Came Back / USA / 6 points / Walter Colmes
8. And Then There Were None / USA / 5 points / René Clair
9. (tie) House of Dracula / USA / 3 points / Erle C. Kenton
9. (tie) Place of One's Own, A / UK / 3 points / Bernard Knowles
9. (tie) Strange Confession / USA / 3 points / John Hoffman
10 (tie) Fog Island / USA / 1 point / Terry O. Morse
10. (tie) Pillow of Death / USA / 1 point / Wallace Fox
10. (tie) Vampire's Ghost, The / USA / 1 point / Lesley Selander

_________________________________________________________________________________

Others receiving votes:

-

_________________________________________________________________________________

Links here will be connected when the time comes.

< Back to 1944                    Continue to 1946 >


The 2015 Orloks - 1943 Results

Started many moons ago by Prof-Hieronymos-Grost, the Orloks were a yearly poll on the IMDb horror boards where users submitted Top 5 lists of their favorite horror movies for each year. All of the results were then tabulated to come up with a definitive list of the year's most-liked genre offerings. Alas, when the good Professor decided to depart the boards years ago, the awards went with him... that is until now. IMDb-er seth_yeah - taking on responsibilities as both host and calculator - has decided to bring back this long-standing tradition in 2015, and now the awards will have a permanent place right here on this blog. Scoring is rather simple and done on a weighted system where first choice receives 5 points, second choice 4 points, etc., with a +1 bonus then awarded to the #1 selection on each list. IMDb release years are being used, but it is left up to voters to determine what they may or may not consider horror (which may be in conflict with IMDb's genre labeling system). If you'd like to participate, head on over to the IMDb HORROR BOARDS to vote! So without any further ado, the results...

_________________________________________________________________________________

1943
Top 5
* * * * * * * * * *
1. I Walked with a Zombie
USA / 39 points / Jacques Tourneur
* * * * * * * * * *
2. The Seventh Victim
USA / 36 points / Mark Robson
* * * * * * * * * *
3. The Leopard Man
USA / 34 points / Jacques Tourneur
* * * * * * * * * *
4. Vredens dag (Day of Wrath)
Denmark / 31 points / Carl Theodor Dreyer
* * * * * * * * * *
5. Son of Dracula
USA / 14 points / Robert Siodmak

_________________________________________________________________________________

Making the Top 10:

6. (tie) Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man / USA / 12 points / Roy William Neill
6. (tie) Ghost Ship, The / USA / 12 points / Mark Robson
7. La main du diable (Carnival of Sinners) / France / 11 points / Maurice Tourneur
8. Shadow of a Doubt / USA / 6 points / Alfred Hitchcock
9. (tie) Captive Wild Woman / USA / 3 points / Edward Dmytryk
9. (tie) Phantom of the Opera / USA / 3 points / Arthur Lubin
10. (tie) Ape Man, The / USA / 1 point / William Beaudine
10. (tie) Calling Dr. Death / USA / 1 point / Reginald Le Borg
10. (tie) Le loup des Malveneur (The Wolf of Malveneurs) / France / 1 point / Guillaume Radot
10. (tie) Return of the Vampires, The / USA / 1 point / Lew Landers

_________________________________________________________________________________

Others receiving votes:

-

_________________________________________________________________________________

Links here will be connected when the time comes.

< Back to 1942                    Continue to 1944 >


Monday, May 11, 2015

The 2015 Orloks - 1936 Results

Started many moons ago by Prof-Hieronymos-Grost, the Orloks were a yearly poll on the IMDb horror boards where users submitted Top 5 lists of their favorite horror movies for each year. All of the results were then tabulated to come up with a definitive list of the year's most-liked genre offerings. Alas, when the good Professor decided to depart the boards years ago, the awards went with him... that is until now. IMDb-er seth_yeah - taking on responsibilities as both host and calculator - has decided to bring back this long-standing tradition in 2015, and now the awards will have a permanent place right here on this blog. Scoring is rather simple and done on a weighted system where first choice receives 5 points, second choice 4 points, etc., with a +1 bonus then awarded to the #1 selection on each list. IMDb release years are being used, but it is left up to voters to determine what they may or may not consider horror (which may be in conflict with IMDb's genre labeling system). If you'd like to participate, head on over to the IMDb HORROR BOARDS to vote! So without any further ado, the results...

_________________________________________________________________________________

1936
Top 5
* * * * * * * * * *
1. Dracula's Daughter
USA / 28 points / Lambert Hillyer
* * * * * * * * * *
2. The Man Who Lived Again
(The Man Who Changed His Mind)
UK / 25 points / Robert Stevenson
* * * * * * * * * *
3. The Devil-Doll
USA / 20 points / Tod Browning
* * * * * * * * * *
4. Fährmann Maria (Ferryman Maria)
Germany / 17 points / Frank Wisbar
* * * * * * * * * *
5. The Walking Dead
USA / 15 points / Michael Curtiz

_________________________________________________________________________________

Making the Top 10:

6. Charlie Chan's Secret / USA / 12 points / Gordon Wiles
7. Invisible Ray, The / USA / 11 points / Lambert Hillyer
8. Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street / UK / 5 points / George King
9. Ouanga (Love Wanga) / USA / 4 points / George Terwilliger
10. Revolt of the Zombies / USA / 3 points / Victor Halperin

_________________________________________________________________________________

Others receiving votes:

- Le golem (The Golem) / Czechoslovakia / Julien Duvivier
- Song of Freedom / UK / J. Elder Wills

_________________________________________________________________________________

Links here will be connected when the time comes.

< Back to 1935                    Continue to 1937 >


Monday, May 4, 2015

Disciples (2014) (copyright 2012)

... aka: Watcher, The

Directed by:
Joe Hollow

I usually pause and jot down some quick notes about the plot and characters as I'm watching movies so I have all the info lined up and ready for when I write my reviews. After this one finished, I was glancing over what I'd written and noticed the names of like twenty characters, who they were or who they were falsely claiming to be, and what they were doing or pretending to be doing while plotting something else entirely (granted they had much relevance to the plot at all, which some don't). That made me realize just what a missed opportunity this was. My notes themselves were a bunch of incomprehensible gibberish. I usually love writing about films, both good films and bad films, but I found myself actually dreading writing this particular review because there's just so much going on I didn't even know where to begin. What's unfortunate in this case is that this has all the basic elements to at least be a somewhat decent B movie. The budget, though not huge by any means, is certainly adequate; adequate enough to afford decent shooting locations and competent and sometimes stylish cinematography, art direction, editing and lighting, as well as a cast filled with familiar faces. The latter will undoubtedly be the film's major drawing card for its DVD / streaming release (it's currently available on Amazon) as it was with me. There's also genuine ambition here to do something just a little bit different. I admire and respect that. At least in theory.






So what went wrong? For starters, the plotting and structure of said plot is really, really bad; lacking in focus yet also annoyingly more complicated than it needed to be. There are not only way too many characters to keep track of but too many muddled, parallel story lines that aren't adequately fleshed out. Add to that a roster of unsavory, underdeveloped characters you could care less about and the positive aspects of the script, including some good ideas and witty dialogue, get completely lost in the shuffle. And while this is strictly a matter of personal taste, this film also suffers from what I like to call “The Rob Zombie Effect.” Meaning, the makers automatically associate the horror genre with “flashy” editing, bursts of metal music, “edgy” / "Goth" young actors who seem plucked from the nearest tattoo parlor or Hot Topic and an overall grimy, dirty aesthetic. Unlike Zombie, writer / director Hollow at least has a modicum of restraint and doesn't turn the entire cast into a bunch of obnoxious, foul-mouthed, cartoon-like buffoons you want to punch in the face five seconds after they open their mouths. His problem is that he doesn't really give us a single character to serve as a central focal point. There's no one to root for and ultimately no real payoff.





The plot. Oh yes, the plot. Groan. I'm really gonna try here, so please bear with me. It appears to be your age-old tale of good vs. evil, except in this case it's more like evil vs. a lesser evil. One of the first people we meet is Serena Cuzzoni (Barbara Magnolfi), who shows up from Parma, Italy to find a priest named Thomas (Morgan Peter Brown) after her father passes away. When Serena first arrives in America, a nun (Tawny Amber Young) tells her Thomas disappeared from the church and hasn't been seen since. After a few scenes, he miraculously shows up, not even bothering to explain why he was hiding from her. He tells her about how the church had been infested with evil in the form of another (fake) priest named William (Tom Lodewyck), who eventually revealed himself to be Asmodeus, the demon of lust. Asmodeus raped a woman at the foot of a cross and then ejaculated on the holy bible before taking off. Sererna explains that her father wouldn't let her go to school and made sure she was a virgin her entire life. Later on, the need for a virgin to complete some kind of ceremony is discussed, but how Serena and company don't factor into any of this may leave you scratching you head and wondering “What in the hell was the point of all that?”






Meanwhile, Father William / Asmodeus turns Elizabeth (Debbie Rochon) into one of his disciples by finger-fucking her (?!) and licking the blood. The two then go to the castle home of Winston (Angus Scrimm in a wheelchair) where they meet up with five other demons who've taken over human bodies as hosts. There's Tatiana (Brinke Stevens), a bitchy, high-ranking bride of Satan, Marishka (Debra Lamb), a slutty demon trapped inside a rotting body who drinks the blood of topless women in a hot tub in order to keep her body from rotting even further, two male “assassins” (Nick Principe and Tim Hays) and Tony Todd as Duncan / Lord Belial, who doesn't even show up until toward the end and is given very little to do. All seven of the demons have both human names and demon names and have gathered together to locate and then put a stop to a family who oppose them and their plans. In the meantime, a few of them have fun with a handful of scantily-clad servant women that Winston has graciously provided them with.





The group's adversaries are a couple of (supposed) “psychopathic killers” who refuse to use their real names and go only by “The Mother” (Rachel Grubb) and “The Father” (Chris Burchette) and haven't aged in over 100 years. The father is haunted by torture porn nightmares where he ties up and mutilates topless women with power tools and envisions himself as a pastor chained to a cross getting whipped by a congregation of zombie people he'd previously killed. They have two daughters: Raine, who was stolen by a secret society funded by the church years earlier and hasn't been seen since, and Victoria (Shannon Lark), who has a magical pendant filled with demon blood that keeps her from aging. The blood of both adult children is needed to resurrect a fallen angel with wings of fire that would (I guess?) put an end to the other group. If the seven demons are unable to stop them, they will be forced to sacrifice their own lives and return to hell, which will in turn open a gateway so that Satan may enter our world and do what they couldn't.






Also involved in this clusterfuck of a plot is Kelly (Kaylee Williams), a young woman who finds Victoria's missing necklace on the beach and turns out to be “the one who bears the mark” (yeahh...), Kelly's long-haired boyfriend Nick (Matt Ukena), who for some moronic reason prays for a succubus with a “carnivorous vagina” to come visit him, Nick's tattooed, foul-mouthed heroin-junkie whore of sister Rachel (Paula Duerksen), who used to suffer from traumatic childhood dreams of being chased by a dragon (?!), Rachel's backstabbing, drug dealer boyfriend Dread (Bill Moseley), who seems cloned from any number of Rob Zombie movie characters, a nameless old lady psychic (Linnea Quigley in old age make-up) who's rumored to be a “total fuckin' whack job” and has more to do with what's going on than first meets the eye and two beings called “Watchers.” At one point, the Serena character is feeling utterly perplexed and defeated and sighs “This is soooo confusing.” And I, and no doubt most other future viewers, will be right there with her.





What does work well here is the majority of the cast. Though most of the younger actors are amateurish and unconvincing, watching the known veterans act out their various scenes and interacting with one another, even in service of an otherwise messy film, was entertaining. I loved what each and every one of these established genre stars brought to the table, most especially the contributions of Todd, Scrimm and Quigley, who was also a co-producer. My very generous two star rating is primarily for what they bring to the film, not the film itself. Lodewyck, who I'd never even heard of before watching this, was also quite effective in his part, and Lark has some potential as evidenced mostly by her final scene. The numerous hallucination / nightmare sequences are stylishly directed and shot, but they're poorly edited and also needlessly muck up an already too-busy film. There's a lot of female nudity thrown in and the special effects are a mixed bag. I actually did like the look of the demon at the end despite some shoddy CGI “enhancements.”






Even though I'm giving Disciples (which was shot in California and Florida in 2011 and 2012) a thumbs down, I'd still like to see the director continue on. There are enough flashes of positive here to suggest he has a good film or two in him. If I could offer up just one suggestion to improve future projects it would be to enlist the aid of a co-writer to help out on the script or a writer to at least help polish it up. Either that, or try to make sure you don't bog your movie down with so much extraneous material. There's just way too much going on here all at once.  Complex “puzzle movies” can be worthwhile, but only if there's an intricate, well-structured mystery to solve or some emotional or intellectual stimulation as a reward. This offers neither.

★★
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...